Mit der Patrone DM 53 ist es möglich, alle bekannten Schutzanordnungen für Kampfpanzer, wie z.B. homogenen Panzerstahl, Mehrplatten- und. Einführung , für Kanone L55, wie DM 53, aber stärkere Treibladung. DM k.A.. k.A.. ~ ~ ~ 12, k.A.. Übungsgeschoss mit Lochkegelleitwerk. 55/L30 mm Glattrohrkanone für Challenger 2 KWS inkl. Munition DM53 in Lizenz für Royal Ordnance, damals für Panzer; SO TDP Programm.
Großkaliberwaffen und MunitionBei der DM53 LKEII wurde Uran in die Legierung des Penetrators beigefügt, um den Wirkungsgrad zu erhöhen und die Kosten der Herstellung. Ein Wuchtgeschoss ist eine Munition, die allein die kinetische Energie (KE) ihres Projektils Ein Beispiel für ein derartiges Geschoss ist die DM 53, die heute im Leopard 2 vom deutschen Heer eingesetzt wird. Sie erreicht in Kombination mit. Massblatt Saugnapf SN-G1/4-DM Einschraubgewinde G1/4; Sauglippendurchmesser 53mm; Stützrippen; Sauglippe aus CR (Cloropropren); Filtersieb in der.
Dm53 Navigation menu VideoProShow Slideshow DM53 DM53s projected/estimated penetrator length is the same as MA1s (DM53 is mm long in total and MA1 roughly ~mm long in total). We know that MA1s penetrator length is ~mm and MA2s ~mm. DM53 is supposed to be in-between them so mm. This penetrator length was also published apaprently according to Conraire. It should be roughly , in range of anywhere from to So the current value is way too low, the fact that DM53 is 55mm longer, is faster, is heavier, is fired from a longer gun than M on L/44 but only ~10mm more is not believable. Unless they give it anti ERA modifier, it won't be any much change since we are back to pixel hunting. DM53 mm Projectile. Description: N/A. Image: Featured category: N/A. Category: Components. SPEC: N/A. MSDS: N/A Product Quote. Company Name * Address Line 1 * Address Line 2. City * State. Zip. Person's Name * Telephone. Fax. E-mail Address .
DMA1 was selected by the armed forces of Finland and Denmark. The new type uses 8. IMI introduced a similar round designated M, which improves the KE performance of its mm KE rounds, and is suitable for all types of guns including L M uses a tungsten core designed for improved penetration and performance.
IMI used a uniquely designed tungsten alloy core, with unique mechanical properties and sabot design to improve accuracy at all combat ranges.
Sign in. Log into your account. We Care About Your Privacy! Centauro 2 turret is immune to 30mm apds and 40mm APFDS with an armor package, its just a matter of gaijoble decision to add hullbreak and make them trash or not.
Well yeah that's sort of fhe point, to kill russia. Also, Gaijin would need to add alot of modern vehicles to every nation if they even want to add a single slightly modern vehicle Gajijn has decided that they are done with italy on the ground.
Imo Italy will get some helicopters with crazy missiles to make them worth using. I think, the big difference between the 2 will actually be in penetration modifier vs ERA.
The pen values are actually low and the devs know this, DM53 should have a minimum of around mm pen and max of mm pen.
How do you know the devs know the pen valurs are low? Did they mention it? I was more assuming either it was a bug or the info for the shell was entered incorrectly into the games shell pen calc which resulted in this.
Because they used an L-O calculator. Segmented penetrators benefits heavily from higher velocities. Oh thats super interesting thx for the link! Ariete waas already powercrept by the Merkava and has been irrelevant for quite a while since gaijin refuses to give it any sort of armor.
Pretty much any nation other than RU is in dire need of capable vehicles, obviously the weaker ones should have priority but we all know how gaigibles doesnt give a fuck.
Blame Gaijin, not the players. More or less everyone had a time of stomping, but never it has been for so long and so one sided like RU is right now.
There are few options: - Gudining the round, - Precursor, - "Intelligent" control over propelant charge ignition dependant on propelant temperature, environment temperature, gun service life, range to target etc.
And truth to be told hypothesis that there is some sort of precursor in the rod is the only hypothesis that makes sense. Control over propelant charge ignition is not needed and probably not possible at all with current technology, besides the MA4 and all newer US ammo types for mm smoothbore use insensitive propelant charges.
And it is nowhere mentioned in any document avaiable for public. Guiding the rod to target? Perhaps possible from technical point of view, but why?
And manouvering of the rod during flight means loss of a lot of energy, even if this manouvering would be done to "cheat" the APS for example.
So perhaps the option is to somehow use a precursor that is "fired ahead" of the main rod. So how the rod designs looks like here?
The rod is made from two segments, the "precursor" and the main rod behind it. How they are connected? The precursor can also be relased based on a simple difference of speed between it and the main rod, and main rod can be slowed down by some sort of additional fins aerodynamic breaks released at specific point programmed by FCS.
In such case precuros would initiate ERA and the main rod would have a clear way to main armor of the target. How to cheat APS tough? Possible yes, but then there is question, if APS will just not ignore the precursor, and this might happen, now of course there is a question how dangerous is precursor itself?
For a MBT or vehicle with similiar levels of protection, for it's front it won't be dangerous in most cases, sides? Read the FAQ.
Do not abuse the NEWS flair. It is intended only for official War Thunder news from Gaijin sites and sources.
Please do not overuse it for e. The MEME flair is intended for memes. It is not a catch-all flair for jokes and satire. Submitting low-effort posts of any kind in quick succession will lead to post removals and may lead to a ban.
If your submission has an unclear title you should submit a top-level comment explaining the content. Posts with "clickbait" titles will be removed.
Memes must be clearly visually relevant to War Thunder. This means just having a witty related caption or title is not enough.
Be creative and tie it into War Thunder. Posts made to promote other games will be removed. If your suggestion is there already, don't post it again.
Must be clearly explained. Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank — Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey. Eshel, David 1 January Eshel, Tamir 1 February Mönch Editorial Group.
Fogg, William; Robert Horner 1 May Gelbart, Marsh Modern Israeli Tanks and Infantry Carriers — Green, Michael; Greg Stewart M1 Abrams At War.
Paul, Minnesota: Zenith Press. Green, Michael Osceola, Wisconsin: Motorbooks International. Hilmes, Rolf 1 December Hilmes, Rolf 1 March Jerchel, Michael; Uwe Schnellbacher Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank — Categories : Ammunition Technical Data.
Navigation menu Personal tools Log in. Namespaces Page Discussion. Views Read View source View history.
This page was last edited on 16 September , at